Campus journalists condemn impunity inside and outside schools

Two days before the second year commemoration of the Ampatuan Massacre was the 32nd birthday of Beng Hernandez, then Features Editor of Atenews, Vice President for Mindanao of the College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP) and the Deputy Secretary-general of human rights group Karapatan. Beng was only 22 when she was mercilessly killed by military personnel in a farmer’s shanty in Arakan, North Cotabato last April 5, 2002. Until now, there is still no justice for Beng despite UN’s resolution holding the Philippine government responsible.

The coincidental proximity of the commemoration of the two events is an opportune occasion for us, campus journalists, to stage our strongest condemnation of the phenomena of impunity in our midst.

When Beng was murdered, our colleagues in the campus press cried for justice. Only few listened. With the one-time liquidation of 58 civilians, of whom 32 were media workers, in Ampatuan, Maguindanao in 2009, a greater number of people cried for justice. And we get a greater chance of being heard. So we in the campus press join in shouting for justice for the 58 victims of the gruesome massacre in the hope of maximizing the venue for mainstreaming the cases of those hundred others who were also killed, unfortunately just not in a controversial massacre. One case is Beng’s.

It was a good leap when many concerned people agreed to declare November 23 as International Day of No Impunity. Those who died without having claimed justice have at last a day each year to be remembered not as mere “souls” (because we do that in November 1 and 2) but as collateral damages of a complex social entropy highlighted by the state’s irresponsibility.

We in CEGP do not see impunity as characterized only by killings. Impunity means not holding a perpetrator of injustice accountable. We consider the more than 300 unresolved cases of campus press freedom violations nationwide as impunity. We consider withholding of student publication’s funds as impunity, censorship as impunity, threats and harassments as impunity. We consider efforts to forcefully close student publications and expulsion of campus journalists as impunity. The number of injustices is rising and no one has yet faced the bars for all these repressive actions.

How can we trust our government to protect journalists like Beng and those killed in Maguindanao when it could not even eliminate the growing list of press freedom violations inside school campuses? While it has not protected workers of truth from threats of death, it has not also delivered justice to those killed. What a very disappointing government we have.

Today, one of the believed master architects of the perpetuation of impunity is now under arrest. In last year’s inaugural speech of PNoy, he said : “There shall be no reconciliation without justice!” The reconciliation part might be unlikely to happen, but please give chance to justice.###

For reference:

Paul Randy P. Gumanao

CEGP Vice President for Mindanao

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | 1 Comment

Zooming-in on the European Union

I have long wanted to visit European countries. I am just envious how they have a culture of intellectual exchanges, how their streets are cleaner than the streets of Davao or Manila, how they have a justice system that is more humane, how they are better compared to my home country. I am always amazed with the fact that a number of Euro countries are welfare states. This amazement is besides my appreciation of how they value history and culture, nature and the sciences. And these made them move forward, these made them developed and capable of extending aids to poor and exploited countries like the Philippines.

My chance to visit Europe was made possible without necessarily leaving Philippines. Last October 27-28 this year, I was one of the delegates to the Campus Journalism Seminar-Workshop held at the University of the Philippines-Diliman and hosted by the European Union Delegation to the Philippines.

One could not get rid of question like: why did the EU tap campus journalists? Why did the EU teach us about foreign affairs reporting? What does the EU want from us?

The answers were explicitly given during the workshop. Officers from the EU said that they are poorly covered by the Philippine media, whose lenses are more zoomed in on the United State’s affairs with the country. In short, EU wanted to invite journalists to tell them “hey, there’s EU who also does a lot of help for your country.” And they wanted to start with us, campus journalists.

Most of the participants of the seminar-workshop were kindred from the 80-year old, progressive and patriotic College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP). As the guild’s vice president for Mindanao, I nodded with affirmation to my colleagues who raised questions on the real score behind the initiatives of the EU in the Philippines and the EU’s trade agenda with our country, especially that DTI Director Perlada presented to us the projected increase in the export of services (labor export) in the next couple of trading years with the EU.

However, I did the same nodding, too, when Ms. Thelma Gecolea, the Public Information Officer of the EU Delegation to the Philippines, answered the questions raised. She said in Filipino, “Nalulungkot ako na marinig na may ilan sa inyo na nag-iisip na kaya kayo inimbita ay para magpopularize ng EU. Hindi naman po iyon ang nais ng EU. Nasa sa inyo na yan kung gusto ninyo kaming isulat o i-feature. Ang sa amin lang ay ipinapaalam namin sa inyo na may European Union at kung ano ang European Union.”

Ms. Thelma was right! It is up to us if we write about EU or not. After all, it is the CEGP’s motto that says “To write is already to choose.”

But, I believe we should write about EU. Not in the sense of popularizing EU, of course. As student journalists and as Filipinos, we should write about the basic truths why EU and all other first-world aid providers are here in our country, in the first place. These foreign aid providers say they long to help our country. We should say, we will help our own country more!

Yes, the EU has very poor media coverage here in our country. If the mainstream media cannot give a focus on EU, the campus press will! We will keep on zooming in on EU until the picture becomes larger and clearer, until the picture is no longer EU but a very rich Philippines, with a very poor distribution of wealth.

I am thankful to the EU for saying, “Hey, we are here! We exist!” I could say, “Yes, many thanks! You’re greatest aid to us is giving us this giant mirror showing the reflections of our worsening social order as a nation, showing how you have filled in what should have been filled by our own state government.”

I hope that mirror would serve us for good. I hope that mirror would move our leaders to action. And if our leaders would choose to remain idle, we, the student journalists, would choose to write and choose to lead.

“To write is already to choose.”

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | 1 Comment

Reflections on the film “The 11th Hour”

After watching the film, I remembered a popular Filipino quote: “Kung hindi ngayon, kalian? Kung hindi tayo, sino?” This is something worth pondering by the scientists of today in responding to the challenges that require scientific prowess, which anyone else could hardly possess.

I find the film moving partly because I am an activist fighting for social transformation and partly because I am a chemistry student and a DOST scholar who has the responsibility to give the worth of the people’s taxes for my education. But what compelled me more to wake up to those truths that came from the experts’ mouths, is that, first and foremost, I am a homo sapiens sapiens, an inhabitant of this feverish planet.

There were a lot of environmental problems discussed in the film. To name a few, these include global warming, massive deforestation, and extinction of species.

It is never new to us to talk about global warming. It has been taught in schools that the major contributors to global warming are the greenhouse gases, which are emissions of human’s burning of fossil fuels. The scientists who explained truths about the global warming said in the film that, in just a span of three decades, our planet’s temperature has rose to 7/10 of a centigrade. What’s more alarming is the projected 5oC rise in temperature for the next couple of years if the contributors to global warming continue unabated. In the film, scientists from first world and first class universities have spoken about the dangers of fossil fuel-burning. But relating that to the reality in our country, particularly in Davao City, some of our scientists, and our equally-intelligent politicians claim that it is okay to burn fossil fuels in the coal-fired plants because, they claim, “we have the state-of-the-art technology”. I hope they made the right claim.

This phenomenon would lead to the melting of the ice caps in the polar regions, which would eventually lead to the rise of sea levels causing a number of land formations to be wiped out of the map. Rumors have it that the coastal parts of Davao City could be among those soon-to-be-sunken-lands. Further, this global warming is manifested in the irregularities in the amount of rainfall and in the pattern of precipitation. In the recent months, our country has experienced natural disasters (that seemed to be unnatural) that were more catastrophic than ever. There have been series of flash floods in Luzon, and even here in the Davao.

This could have been prevented if trees and old growth forests were abundant. Trees in the forests are capable of consuming carbon dioxide that, when trapped in the atmosphere, is a major cause of global warming. A tree, according to the film, can also hold about 57,000 gallons of water, enough to prevent flashfloods. But this is the case: massive deforestation. The more we know about global warming, the more laxed we have become in issuing logging permits and environmental compliance certificates to corporations, and not being strict in monitoring their activities, not even penalizing violators of laws. Our authorities have become vehement in looking after illegal loggers who cut trees piece by piece, while loosely allowing legal loggers to load logs truck by truck. Add to this the massive conversion of forests and fertile lands into agro-industrial zones believed to produce high-value crops for export, while the local residents suffer from starvation.

But humans are not the only ones starving. We also have neighbours in this planet, most of them face extinction. The film showed how humans have dominated the world and destroyed the biodiversity of the ecosystem. Extinction follows after the natural habitats of organisms are destroyed, and their survival threatened. It was shown in the film how, for instance, large fishing boats catch millions of fishes more frequently than these fishes are able to reproduce in the oceans. The danger of this extinction of organisms is the disruption of the food chain, to which we, humans, are part of. This also disrupts ecological chemistry.

Who then should make the first move for the reconciliation with nature? I remembered our lesson in Theology about ecological sins.  We were taught that environmental problems, especially to us, science majors, have to be dealt with by curing their root causes. Tree planting, while it helps, is not enough when the number of coal-fired plants continue to rise each year. Waste segregation, while it helps, is not enough when more consumer goods are packed in plastic containers everyday. So, what to do? “We have to completely and essentially change the system,” answers one of the scientists interviewed. “The problem is a cultural problem,“ supports another.

I agree that we could start a bold move with ourselves, especially to us, men and women of science. It is about time that we end the cycle of being confined within our laboratories. Our fellowmen, as said in the film, “need heightened awareness” in order to respond. We have that duty to inform them of the truths of our researches and studies. Let us end the cycle of just being quoted in major reports. We have to speak ourselves about the scientific facts that others have to know because we are more credible.

But generally, this grand problem of environmental degradation is best answered by our leaders. More budget must be channelled to education, research, science and technology than to debt servicing and militarization. These have long been our calls in the streets, our calls in the legislative venues. Perhaps, government leaders would listen to scientists than to poor farmers and workers rallying. So we, especially those called experts, should actively do our part because time is running fast.

Most of all, as Dr. David Suzuki said in the film, “it may be hippie dippie”, but the most essential solution, “is love.” Yes, we should help end, this economic system governed by corporate greed and consumerism. While it is not bad to consume, we should not consume more than what we need. We have to respect nature, because, said one speaker in the film, “nature has rights, too. They are not mere properties.” We still have a minute to create a sustainable future!

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | Leave a comment

Father Pops, do not rest in their false peace!

One of the reasons why I have not fully lost my trust in the catholic clergy is the fact that there are still priests who exemplify Christ’s mission- to become pastors with preferential option for the oppressed and the powerless. Father Fausto “Pops” Tentorio was one of those few priests who chose to leave the comforts of the convents of the parishes in the urban in exchange of simple yet relevant life in the hinterlands with the lumads.

I remember Father Pops as a close friend of my parents who are both development workers. He was a man with an intimidating foreign looks, but with an intimate Filipino heart. In fact, Father Pops was more Filipino than most of us! He spoke fluent Hiligaynon, and perhaps, Manobo, too. Every time he presided mass in the cathedral, he always wore “tubaw” around his head, and his feet, with slippers on, as does his fellow PIME missionary, Father Peter Geremia. But his being Filipino-at-heart did not end up with the way he talked or dressed. His was a familiar face in big mobilizations in the province especially when it involved issues on Indigenous Peoples’ ancestral domain, development aggressions in the form of mining and agribusiness that are almost always showcased with militarization. His was a firm voice in saying NO to policies that endanger the cultural identity of lumads. But his advocacies encompass concerns of peasants and workers. He was always in the midst of the Filipino people in the quest for a peace based on justice.

Now that his body is dead, my memories of him are becoming more alive. I can now perfectly remember the taste of the dark chocolate he gave us as a pasalubong from his visit to his “former home country”, Italy. It was as bitter as this feeling of grief on the loss of a person who I refuse to claim as a personal friend, because I believe he was a man who rejected the desperate idea of personal possessions. He was a man who offered his person to the multitude of nameless masses.

His butchers failed to discourage me to pursue the fight of Fr. Pops. His butchers made it clear to me that the use of force is justified especially when, according to Father Joel Tabora, SJ, it is used to free the society of unjust violence. His butchers taught me that standing forcefully in defense of the welfare of the many is “a just expression of Christian hope”. Father Pops, do not rest in their false peace! We have yet to claim the justice!

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | Leave a comment

Oplan Bayanihan implementors, PNoy government responsible for the killing of Fr. Tentorio – Karapatan-SMR

Press Release
21 October 2011

Oplan Bayanihan implementors, PNoy government responsible for the killing of Fr. Tentorio – Karapatan-SMR

Davao City – “The revelation of a fellow Italian missionary priest on the inclusion of Fr. Fausto ‘Pops’ Tentorio, PIME, in the military’s Order of Battle list exposed the fact that extra-judicial killings and other forms of human rights violations continue to be committed with utter impunity under the Aquino government,” concluded Hanimay Suazo, Secretary General of Karapatan Southern Mindanao.

Suazo said this after Fr. Peter Geremia, a colleague of Fr. Tentorio, told the members of fact-finding mission team that both of them were included in the military’s Order of Battle list.

“Based on fact-finding mission report, the killing of Fr. Pops Tentorio happened during the time when the military under the 57th Infantry Battalion was conducting their Oplan Bayanihan activities,”

Presented in yesterday’s tribute to Fr. Tentorio, the Fact-Finding Report revealed that weeks before Fr. Tentorio was killed, daily surveillance was conducted by suspicious-looking men.

Suazo said surveillance activities on known leaders and supporters of legitimate organizations who are critical to anti-people and anti-environment policies, projects and programs is one of the activities of the government’s counter-insurgency program Oplan Bayanihan other than psychological warfare, deception and vilification of legitimate and progressive organizations as ‘enemies of the State’.

Suazo added that Fr. Tentorio had constantly been receiving threats because of his support to the lumads and farmers in their struggle for land rights and against ‘development aggression’ and militarization which made him target of harassment and vilification campaign from the military and paramilitary groups

The Karapatan leader stressed the circumstantial evidences that point to state security agents as primary suspects of the brutal killing of Fr. Tentorio.

According to the fact-finding report Fr. Tentorio was already targeted by ‘Baganis, a paramilitary group created by 73rd Infantry Battalion under the 10th Infantry Division, since 2003 when he almost lost his life.

“The killing of Fr. Tentorio in broad daylight shows that perpetrators still think that they can get away with their crime. The utter failure of the Aquino government to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of extra-judicial killings and other human rights violations fuel further violations committed by state agents. And we hold the Aquino government accountable for this,” ,” said Suazo

Based on Karapatan’s monitoring, Fr. Tentorio is the 54th victim of extra-judicial killings (EJK) and the first EJK victim from the Roman Catholic Church under the Aquino government.

Aquino’s continued mouthing slogans of “daang matuwid” and “respect for human rights and international humanitarian law” could no longer cover up the increasing number of human rights violations under his government, especially with the implementation of his version of counter-insurgency program Oplan Bayanihan.##

For reference:

Hanimay I. Suazo
Secretary General
KARAPATAN Southern Mindanao Region
Mobile number: 0929-401-4945

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | Leave a comment

Grayscale and Monotone

When it rains, I see things in grayscale
and hear things in monotone, resembling
every raindrop as each taps the ground
drop after drop, but not simultaneous.

Grayscale is how I stereotype memories,
and monotone, my solitude. Grayscale
is the safest hue to make a quick imaginary
blackening and deletion of haunting pasts.

And the best moment to delete bad memories
is when it is raining, you get a free flush.
And the raindrops synchronize rhythms
with my hearbeats, slow, fast, fast and heavy.

Later, a moment of silence. Later, a whisper
to myself, “That was me then. I have changed.”
Nothing is more hurting than progressing
while others are left in their old thoughts

saying, “you were excellent then, how come?”
Smile is the best answer. Now is not the right
time to tell them that I redefined excellence.
Now is not the right time to defend myself.

One wrong move of defense might be considered
an excuse, just a reason to run away from the rain.
When it rains, I wish lightnings would hit them
because I save only the lightnings from being gray

and I save only the thunders from being monotonous.
Grayscale removes the luster from my medals
and plaques. Monotone deafens their applauses.
After this rain is a new life. And life’s excellence

is best offered to people who vividly see the color
of blood and flesh being butchered each day,
to people who clearly hear cries and anguish.
Life’s excellence is beyond grayscale and monotone.

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | Leave a comment

Pieta (Filipino), alang sa mga ginikanan ni kaubang Alvin!

Sabihin mo kung gaano mo kamahal ang iyong anak,
kung paano mo maaring hagkan kanyang mga daliri’t
haplusin ang kanyang balat. Alam ko, gaya ng sabi mo,
kung paano mo inihahanda ang mga gulay na iyong ginigiling

at isinusubo sa kanya. Totoo bang hindi siya natutulog
hangga’t di mo siya isinasayaw habang siya’y nakakalong?
Nakakatuwa! Hindi ko mawari kung paano ka nagalak
noong natuto na siyang magbukas-sara ng kanyang palad

habang kinakantahan mo ng “close-open”.
Binanggit mo rin kung gaano siya kabilis
natutong magsalita, gaano kabilis natutong maglakad.
Talaga bang wala pa siyang isang taon noon?

Ahh, eh di dalawamput isang taon na pala siya ngayon!
Bakit ka nababalisa kung siya’y lumilisan? Ikaw ang nagturo
sa kanyang lumakad. Huwag, pakiusap. Huwag kang umiyak kung
naaalala mong siya’y nagsasalita’t nagpapahayag. Nagpapasalamat

lamang siya dahil natutunan na niya kung paano higpitan
ang kanyang kamao. Wala ng kantang “close-open”.
Kinailangan niyang maging matatag dahil marami
ang hindi man lamang makakain kahit na giniling na gulay.

Dapat kang matuwa dahil hindi lumaking makasarili
ang iyong anak. Dangal mo siyang anak ng maraming magulang,
kapatid ng maraming kapatid, martir ng bayan.
At itinugon niya sa akin, kung hindi na siya babalik

at kung wala ka nang mababalitaan sa kanya, tahakin mo
ang kanyang landas. Pulutin mo ang bawat niyang buto at hagkan siya.
Hindi siya mamamahinga hanggat hindi mo siya isinasayaw
sa saliw at ritmo ng mga tangis, hikbi at sigaw.

Posted in Pulitika at Lipunan | 2 Comments